pH and the Solubility of Antimicrobials in Drinking Water

By Jake Anderson |

Dual Consideration of the Stock Bucket and the Drinker Lines Using Continuous Water Treatment

Delivering medication through the waterlines for swine and livestock is not a new practice and can be one of the most efficient methods of providing a true therapeutic dose. However, there can be challenges with solubility of medications in the stock bucket and inside the water lines depending on the pH of the source water. Certain medications (powdered antibiotic formulations) will dissolve and then remain dissolved differently, sometimes depending on the acidity or alkalinity (or pH) of the drinking water. There are many factors other than pH that can also influence solubility, stability, bioavailability, and therapeutic potential. These include other water contaminants (such as iron and manganese), solubility of the molecule (the raw drug dispersion actually prefers oil vs water), particle size of the drug and carrier, other “non-active” ingredients in the drug bucket/packet, cleanliness of the stock bucket, physical attributes of the product (like coatings or encapsulation) and water temperature.

Certain medications or certain classes of medications optimally require different pH ranges to completely dissolve and remain in solution during the medication process. Water can generally be broken down into three categories: acidic (pH <7), neutral (pH =7) and basic (pH >7). Therapeutic medication’s preferred solubility can also be separated into the same three categories (or buckets).

One of the most common methods used to address these specific pH requirements is sometimes, depending on the pH of the incoming water, to adjust the pH of the medication stock solution. Generally, there are three methods: The first method is using a weak acid (like citric acid) to create slightly more acidic water with a target solution that has a pH target below 6.5. The second method is to add sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) to drive the pH up to a maximum of 8.4. The third method is to add ammonia to borrow a proton from water and produce more hydroxide, making the water more alkaline. All of these methods work to address the solubility concerns in the stock solution container (delivery step 1), but what about the source water inside the waterlines being dosed by the medicator from the stock solution (delivery step 2)? 

The pH of an individual farm’s drinking water often has not been addressed by the grower, the nutritionist, or the veterinarian; the performance of the drug will partially be determined by optimizing pH throughout the water system. More often than not, the stock solutions will be dosed at a ratio of 1:128 or 0.78% by volume, so the pH alteration that has been done to this water is quickly going to be nullified (i.e., “buffered”) by well water in the waterline, as it will comprise greater than 99% of the mixture. If the pH of the source water is not pH-aligned for a specific medication, there are two risks for the grower and integrator/processor: 1) there is an under-dosing risk via the medication precipitating out of the water into the bottom curvature of the PVC waterline pipe and biofilm/gunk, and 2) there is a drug residue risk by delaying drug delivery to the hog due to settling and delayed release caused by physical dislodging/slugging of antibiotic during high water flow times (i.e., older and larger animals consuming more water at a greater rate, hotter weather). 

The good news is this problem can easily be corrected. Most progressive farms today have been retrofitted with a metering pump system for water treatment and continuous waterline disinfection. This is usually a two-part system: one with a chlorine (i.e., chlorine dioxide precursor–chlorite) and one with an acid to activate the chlorine via acidification. The acid is the piece we are interested in for the purpose of assisting antibiotic solubility. The acid, in this case, is going to be used both for activation of the ClO2 precursor and for pH alteration of the water for acid soluble antibiotics. As discussed and pH certainly impacts solubility of antimicrobial medications in water.

If a tool has already been installed that has the ability to alter the pH of the water, why not use it? There are a few pieces of information that need to be known for this to be effective. The process to optimize solubility for oral antimicrobials is:

  1. What is the starting pH of the source/well water? You can determine this with a simple pH meter or good, high-color contrast pH strips. 
  2. Match the medication. The second piece will be to match the medication that is going to be (prescribed) administered with the pH range that is needed for solubility of the medication in the stock bucket. Once these are known and a general, desired pH has been established from Table 1, it may be as simple as using the acidified water to make the stock bucket solution. There are going to be circumstances where you do not want to be lowering the pH of the water (i.e., basic or alkaline antibiotics). For example Sulfadimethoxine, or SDM, requires basic (pH > 7) water to remain optimally soluble. In a situation where SDM has been chosen as the infection treatment, and the site has an acid dosing pump as part of continuous water treatment, it would be advised for the acid to be turned off for the duration of the medication process to ensure the maintained solubility of the product. In this case, it is assumed that the well water is slightly or significantly alkaline, which is usually the case for most well water. For neutral pH antibiotics, the acid levels in continuous water treatment may simply be temporarily turned down for water treatment and stock bucket filling, to achieve a neutral pH.

With a few pieces of information and proper, comprehensive water treatment tools, the pH of the water can be tailored to the medication to help solubility and stability of the drug not only in the stock solution but throughout the barn’s waterlines as well.                           


About the Authors

Jake Anderson

Water Treatment
MWI Animal Health
Jake Anderson is a member of MWI’s Technical Services group. As a team, this group provides our clients with targeted expertise in integrated pest management, proactive disease/pathogen and performance management, animal drinking water quality improvement, biosecurity, and cleaning and disinfection.
View Bio
Dr. Scott McKenzie

Scott McKenzie

Ph. D. Toxicology, B.S. Animal Science, B.S. Biomedical Science
Director, Technical Services
Dr. McKenzie leads MWI's Technical Services groups. As a team, this group provides our clients with targeted expertise in integrated pest management, proactive disease/pathogen and performance management, animal drinking water quality improvement, biosecurity, and cleaning and disinfection. 
View Bio